Why do consumers purchase spiritual goods?

The idea that “what you are getting is more valuable to you than the money you spend” is fundamental to buying.

Read More: lotus

However, it might be difficult to determine exactly what spiritual items are offering.

It might be a subscription, access to lessons, a one-on-one or group session where you get some understanding, or even a therapeutic approach.

It may occasionally be the sense of being recognized and welcomed for who you are. It could be the solution for loneliness or alienation. It could be a means of giving your life direction and significance.

It could help you feel more worthy of respect or to boost your self-esteem. It could be a feeling of acceptance. a satisfaction of a need for approval.

The majority of the aforementioned are deep-seated demands or desires. They might therefore be quite lucrative.

Eventually, as a spiritual seeker, you will come across the proverb “everything you need is already within you.”

The issue then becomes, “Why pay money for something you already own?”

It’s comparable, in my opinion, to paying for coaching. A skilled coach encourages you to identify, develop, and showcase your innate abilities. They can’t train you, but they can provide you constructive criticism, point out your errors, and encourage you when you’re feeling down.

A other perspective on this would be to consider priorities. Giving money for something indicates to everyone around you and to yourself that this “something” is a priority and that it is essential to you. Therefore, investing money on spiritual goods might be a means for people to declare to themselves, “I am now taking my spiritual development seriously.”

Should spiritual guidance or goods be given away for free?

Some claim that they should, in fact. Because as the information originates from the Source—God or Divinity—it ought to be available to everybody. If that were the case, then, why isn’t the information currently available to everyone? Why are there still instructors in the world? Why is “Source” giving these professors special treatment?

Therefore, perhaps what you’re paying for isn’t the material but rather the coaching, mentorship, and example. Even if the information is out there, not everyone can simply get to the location where it is located.

I disagree with the argument that the instructors’ need for food justifies the cost. Instead of buying products to feed the instructors, people buy them because they find value in them. Indeed, it is a pleasant side effect, but not the primary one. There is a transfer of energy. Students are eager to spend more the more value they receive. In this method, the instructor receives additional income that they may utilize to either improve their standard of living or to continue teaching.

It is possible that spirituality functions similarly like any other business in that pupils are ready to pay for the value that the instructor creates. How do you feel?